Building comparison
head to head
Indiana Jones and the Fate of AtlantisvsMashinky
Neither is harder. They score identically on all four axes, so the difference between them is in kind, not degree.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
Optimization · Pure Optimization
LucasArts adventure sending Indy down three routes toward Atlantis.
Mashinky
Optimization · Pure Optimization
Designing efficient rail networks against a board-game-like token economy.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Mashinky leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Indiana Jones and the Fate of AtlantisMashinky
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 1
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
Pointing and clicking, light fistfight option
Mashinky
Laying track is unhurried construction
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
No adaptive opposition
Mashinky
No adaptive competitor on the rails
Variance2 vs 2
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
Solutions hidden until reasoned out
Mashinky
Procedural maps are unknown only until surveyed
Optimization8 vs 8
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
Three-path puzzle chains reward deduction
Mashinky
Network design and token economics are the whole game
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.