head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Grand Arena
A superhero fighter with gear-based customisation where execution and opponent reads sit atop a deep optimisation layer.

Execution · Grand Arena
Frantic tag-team fighter crossing Capcom's mutants with World Warriors.
Injustice 2 leans Execution (Grand Arena); X-Men vs. Street Fighter leans Execution (Grand Arena).
X-Men vs. Street Fighter leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Injustice 2
Supermove confirms and precise character-specific combos demand execution
X-Men vs. Street Fighter
Infinite combos and tag execution demand serious hands.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Injustice 2
Meter burn mix-ups and opponent tendency tracking are constant
X-Men vs. Street Fighter
Human opponents adapt mixups every round.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Injustice 2
No RNG; transparent match states
X-Men vs. Street Fighter
Fully visible game state.
Injustice 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Injustice 2
Gear stat distribution and character sub-archetype selection reward planning
X-Men vs. Street Fighter
Team synergy and matchup theory reward lab time.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.