head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A co-op puzzle-platformer that tests physical coordination and communication across a wide variety of co-designed mechanics.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.
It Takes Two leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
It Takes Two leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
It Takes Two
Co-op platforming demands tight timing, coordination, and spatial precision
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
It Takes Two leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
It Takes Two
Human partner requires some coordination reads but not competitive prediction
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
It Takes Two
Puzzle solutions are fixed; little hidden randomness
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
It Takes Two leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
It Takes Two
Each chapter has an optimal movement approach once mechanics are learned
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.