head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Arcade monster wrestling testing grapple timing and versus-mode throw mindgames.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Reversal-timing duels where humans bait each other inside scripted spectacle.
King of the Monsters leans Execution (Competitive PvP); WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
King of the Monsters leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
King of the Monsters
Grapple timing and positioning decide monster bouts
WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011
Reversal timing windows reward practiced reactions
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
King of the Monsters
Versus humans, throw-tech mindgames add real prediction
WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011
Versus humans, reversal baiting becomes a guessing duel
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
King of the Monsters
Grapple outcomes carry arcade-era randomness
WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011
Momentum swings and AI quirks add mild chaos
WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
King of the Monsters
Small movesets converge to known optimal loops fast
WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011
Move sets, match types and creation systems are learnable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.