head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A relaxed family collect-a-thon testing completionist routing over any reflex.

Execution · Light / Casual
Cheerful physics platformer about a kicking blob toppling a capitalist conspiracy.
LEGO Harry Potter: Years 5-7 leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Pikuniku leans Execution (Light / Casual).
Pikuniku leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
LEGO Harry Potter: Years 5-7
Forgiving spell-casting and platforming for kids
Pikuniku
Floppy kicks and hops, gently imprecise
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
LEGO Harry Potter: Years 5-7
Enemies are scripted props posing no adaptive threat
Pikuniku
No adversary anywhere
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
LEGO Harry Potter: Years 5-7
Collectibles are fixed, just initially unknown
Pikuniku
Short authored world with few surprises
LEGO Harry Potter: Years 5-7 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
LEGO Harry Potter: Years 5-7
Spell-gated collectible routing is the real activity
Pikuniku
Simple puzzles with obvious solutions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.