head to head

Magic: The Gathering - Battlegrounds cover artvsThe Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II cover art

Magic: The Gathering - BattlegroundsvsThe Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II

Magic: The Gathering - Battlegrounds leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).

EXECUTION5 /10READS4 /10VARIANCE3 /10OPTIMIZATION6 /10
Magic: The Gathering - BattlegroundsThe Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II

Axis by axis

Execution5 vs 5

Even - both lean on execution about the same.

Reads4 vs 5

The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II leans harder on reads: Human opponents in skirmish reward prediction

Variance3 vs 2

Magic: The Gathering - Battlegrounds leans harder on variance: Opponent spellbook is hidden until revealed in duel

Optimization6 vs 7

The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II leans harder on optimization: Economy, base layout, and faction counters drive wins

Two games can score the same on an axis and still test it in very different ways - read each rationale, not just the number.

full breakdown

Magic: The Gathering - Battlegrounds

full breakdown

The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II