head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
WWII shooter remembered for its Omaha Beach landing and tense rifle duels.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
Tests twitchy miniature car control and track memory amid party-weapon chaos.
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Micro Machines V3 leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
classic FPS aim, leaning, and sniping
Micro Machines V3
Tiny cars on twisty tabletops punish every slip
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
historic multiplayer scene rewarded outguessing humans
Micro Machines V3
Couch rivals can be baited with weapons and nudges
Micro Machines V3 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
scripted ambushes surprise only once
Micro Machines V3
Pickup spawns and chaos shuffle close races
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
encounter memorization, especially Omaha Beach
Micro Machines V3
Track memorisation and shortcut lines pay off
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.