head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Series finale blending stealth with active battlefields and heavy cinematics.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Open-world survival-flavored tactical shooter built around gear progression and base infiltration.
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
flexible gunplay alongside sneaking
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Stealth shooting and drone play reward precise aim
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
battlefield factions act on scripts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Drones and soldiers run fixed behaviors, never model you
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
mid-battle chaos mostly cosmetic
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Patrols and gear drops add light randomness
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
camo, gear, and route knowledge per act
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Gear score, builds, and infiltration routes drive success
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots →
full breakdown
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint →