head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
The peak-era Konami football game prized for weighty, skill-driven match play.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A physics-driven multiplayer hockey game testing precise control and reading opponents.
Pro Evolution Soccer 6 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Puck leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Puck leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Pro Evolution Soccer 6
First touch, through balls, and dribbles demand precise control
Puck
Precise stick angle and body control decide every play
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pro Evolution Soccer 6
Versus matches are constant feint and positioning prediction
Puck
Multiplayer rewards selling fakes and predicting human positioning
Puck leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Pro Evolution Soccer 6
Deflections and keeper spills add light randomness
Puck
Puck physics add bounces but reward control over luck
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pro Evolution Soccer 6
Formations and player roles are studyable
Puck
Positioning and angle discipline form a learnable layer
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.