head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Gentleman puzzler solves a village full of standalone brainteasers.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A claustrophobic time-loop puzzle where knowing the exact dialogue and item sequence breaks the cycle.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Twelve Minutes leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village
Stylus taps only; no dexterity pressure at all
Twelve Minutes
Point-and-click real-time loop demands minimal physical precision
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village
No opponent, adaptive or otherwise
Twelve Minutes
Loop characters follow scripts that update only on information triggers
Twelve Minutes leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village
Puzzle answers are hidden until reasoned out, then fixed
Twelve Minutes
Hidden knowledge about the loop's logic creates investigative uncertainty
Twelve Minutes leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village
Every brainteaser has one clean solvable answer
Twelve Minutes
Information is the resource; knowing exactly what to say and when fully solves the loop
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.