head to head
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction asks more than Red Dead Redemption 2, and the gap is optimization.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
The PS3 debut of Ratchet & Clank, mixing exotic weapons with an upgrade-driven adventure.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction
Third-person shooting and platforming, moderately demanding
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction
Scripted enemy waves
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction
Deterministic encounters
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction leans clearly harder on optimization.
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction
Weapon levelling economy and upgrade pathing
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.