Building comparison
head to head
Rayman OriginsvsVector
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.
Rayman Origins
Execution · Pure Mechanics
A hand-animated revival of Rayman's 2D platforming.
Vector
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Timing parkour inputs through fixed chase levels with escalating precision.
Rayman Origins leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Vector leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Rayman OriginsVector
Axis by axis
Execution7 vs 7
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Rayman Origins
Fluid run-jump-glide chains
Vector
Precise swipe timing on parkour tricks decides every chase
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Rayman Origins
Scripted enemies
Vector
The pursuing hunter is fully scripted
Variance1 vs 0
Rayman Origins leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Rayman Origins
Deterministic levels
Vector
Levels are fixed with nothing random
Optimization4 vs 3
Rayman Origins leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Rayman Origins
Lum routing for perfection
Vector
Learning trick placements per level maximises scores
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.