head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A linear stealth platformer testing patience with intended climbing routes.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); The Lord of the Rings: Gollum leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
The Lord of the Rings: Gollum
Climbing and stealth timing are loose and forgiving
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
The Lord of the Rings: Gollum
Orc patrols loop fixed routes
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
The Lord of the Rings: Gollum
Levels are static once seen
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
The Lord of the Rings: Gollum
Stealth paths have clear intended solutions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.