head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Tests patience with scripted encounters and light adventure-game routing.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Basic melee, archery and stealth need only modest timing
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Enemies follow simple scripts; nothing adapts
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Encounters are fixed; little is random once seen
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Learning levels, item use and encounter order carries the game
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Red Dead Redemption 2 →
full breakdown
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring →