head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
The classic survival horror sequel where ammo budgeting and route knowledge tame Raccoon City.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A third-person roguelike where item snowballs outscale the difficulty timer.
Resident Evil 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Risk of Rain 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Risk of Rain 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Resident Evil 2
Tank controls and aim need competence, not mastery
Risk of Rain 2
Aim and movement matter under escalating swarm pressure.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Resident Evil 2
Zombies are scripted, never adaptive
Risk of Rain 2
Enemies follow fixed AI; no opponent models you.
Risk of Rain 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Resident Evil 2
First-run item and enemy placement is hidden information
Risk of Rain 2
Item drops and stage selection randomized each run.
Risk of Rain 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Resident Evil 2
Routing, ammo economy, and puzzles fully converge on replay
Risk of Rain 2
Item stacking and scaling routes dominate run outcomes.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.