head to head
Star Wars: Battlefront II asks more than The Mean Greens: Plastic Warfare, and the gap is optimization.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Large-battle aim and positioning with light prediction against human players.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A casual team shootout where aim and basic opponent awareness decide rounds.
Star Wars: Battlefront II leans Execution (Competitive PvP); The Mean Greens: Plastic Warfare leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Star Wars: Battlefront II
Aimbot dominates infantry fights and starfighter dogfights
The Mean Greens: Plastic Warfare
Aimbot would dominate these third-person toy-soldier shootouts
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Star Wars: Battlefront II
Human opponents in multiplayer create modest prediction play
The Mean Greens: Plastic Warfare
Human opponents in objective modes reward positional prediction
Star Wars: Battlefront II leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Star Wars: Battlefront II
Spawns, vehicle availability and hero pickups add chaos
The Mean Greens: Plastic Warfare
Random spawns and chaotic lobbies add mild noise
Star Wars: Battlefront II leans clearly harder on optimization.
Star Wars: Battlefront II
Class choice and map control reward learned plans
The Mean Greens: Plastic Warfare
Objective routes are simple; little system depth to solve
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.