head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Risk-budgeting resistance actions against historical events and probabilistic crackdowns.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Juggling rival faction demands and island economics to keep your dictator in power.
Through the Darkest of Times leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Tropico 4 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Tropico 4 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Through the Darkest of Times
Turn-based planning with no physical component
Tropico 4
Decree-clicking requires no dexterity
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Through the Darkest of Times
The regime escalates on historical script, not by modelling you
Tropico 4
Faction AI follows fixed ideological scripts, not player modeling
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Through the Darkest of Times
Raids, arrests and event outcomes roll against hidden odds
Tropico 4
Random events and election outcomes inject meaningful uncertainty
Tropico 4 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Through the Darkest of Times
Balancing morale, funds and member risk is a solvable system
Tropico 4
Balancing factions, treasury, and production chains is the core loop
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.