Gamorium's take

Pre-solving battles through ship design and deployment, then watching the answer play out.
the cheat-test profile
Each axis is rated on its own - how far one cheat would trivialize the game here. They don't trade off; low on all four means the game is an experience, not a contest.
cheat: Aimbot - perfect inputs
Battles run hands-off once deployed
cheat: Out-predict an adaptive opponent
Async challenges exist but fleets cannot adapt mid-fight
cheat: See what's hidden / map the RNG
Unknown enemy loadouts add pre-battle hidden information
cheat: A perfect solver / coach
Ship design and deployment orders decide everything before combat starts
Each axis is named by the cheat that would break the game along it. Execution is the hands. Reads is out-thinking an adaptive opponent. Variance is hidden information & RNG. Optimization is the solvable systems layer. A game's region is the top one or two axes.
These four aren't one rating split four ways - they're independent 0-10 questions. A 9 on one axis takes nothing from the others, and a game low on all four isn't missing data: it's telling you there's no skill here to cheat.
The basis is how the majority actually plays this game - not a niche mode or a personal run. For a game with very different modes (a story campaign versus ranked multiplayer), that's the version most people mean.
Ranked by shared genre first, then by how closely the cheat-test profile matches - a cross-genre tag means a pick matched on skill profile alone.

Divinity: Original Sin II - Definitive Edition
Pure Optimization · tactical RPG

Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords
Pure Optimization · story-driven RPG