AM2R

Both lean on execution about the same (6 vs 6). Otherwise the profiles match closely.

Both lean on execution about the same (6 vs 6). Otherwise the profiles match closely.

Both lean on execution about the same (6 vs 6). Otherwise the profiles match closely.

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 5) - Bow aim, QTEs, and platforming timing matter.

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 5) - Set-piece gunplay and traversal under fire

Both lean on variance about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 7) - Perfect analog inputs trivialise precise jumps, dives and wall-kicks

Both lean on variance about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 5) - Tight platforming with trial-and-error.

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 7) - Precise platforming and bash-chain escape sequences

Both lean on execution about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: reads (1 vs 2) - Human partner requires some coordination reads but not competitive prediction

Both lean on execution about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: optimization (5 vs 4) - Relic and upgrade choices shape runs

Both lean on variance about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 5) - Fluid traversal and aimed particle powers

Both lean on variance about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 7) - Demanding jump chains and animal-buddy control