
games like
BlazBlue: Chrono Phantasma Extend
BlazBlue: Chrono Phantasma Extend leans Execution (Competitive PvP). Below: catalogued games with the closest cheat-test profile, and exactly where each one differs.
Matched first against: Fighting, Arcade - then ranked by cheat-test profile.
Like BlazBlue: Chrono Phantasma Extend, but easier
Same cheat-test neighborhood, lower Execution demand - the hands aren't as punishing.
9 games like BlazBlue: Chrono Phantasma Extend
A cross-genre tag below means that pick didn't share a genre - it filled a slot on cheat-test profile alone.

Both lean on execution about the same (8 vs 8). Otherwise the profiles match closely.
full comparison →
Both lean on execution about the same (8 vs 8). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - No RNG; transparent match flow
full comparison →
Both lean on reads about the same (8 vs 8). Biggest difference: execution (8 vs 9) - Frame-precise inputs and combo timing define every matchup
full comparison →
Both lean on execution about the same (8 vs 8). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Weapon spawns add minor randomness.
full comparison →
Both lean on reads about the same (8 vs 8). Biggest difference: execution (8 vs 9) - Bound combos and movement push a high physical ceiling
full comparison →
Both lean on execution about the same (8 vs 8). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - No RNG; ring position is full information
full comparison →
Both lean on execution about the same (8 vs 8). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Open information; nothing hidden between rounds
full comparison →
Both lean on execution about the same (8 vs 8). Biggest difference: reads (8 vs 7) - Baiting a human's assist call or super is the duel
full comparison →
Both lean on execution about the same (8 vs 8). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Near-fully visible game state
full comparison →Game details
- Released
- 2014
- Developer
- Arc System Works
- Platforms
- Arcade, PS3, PS4, PC, Vita, XONE
- Modes
- Single player, Multiplayer, Co-operative
- IGDB critics
- 85/100
- IGDB users
- 90/100