Hiveswap: Act 1

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Otherwise the profiles match closely.

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Action sequences use basic QTE with low penalty for failure

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (3 vs 2) - Event rolls add flavour, all quickly mapped

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (3 vs 2) - Dialogue timing creates minor branching uncertainty

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (3 vs 2) - Hidden killer identities and evidence drive trial uncertainty

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: optimization (5 vs 4) - Deduction sequences are guided puzzles with known answers

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (3 vs 2) - Minor drop and emotion randomness

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 0) - Pointing and clicking has no physical ceiling

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (3 vs 2) - Mild unknowns in puzzle solutions on a blind playthrough

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (3 vs 2) - Puzzle solutions hidden until discovered

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Clunky combat is deliberately undemanding

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: optimization (5 vs 6) - Most solutions are found through joyful trial-and-error rather than logic chains