head to head
Borderlands 2 asks more than Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs, and the gap is execution.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
A narrative-driven horror walk through a Victorian slaughterhouse engine, lighter on systems than its predecessor.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
Loot-shooter RPG built on gear chasing.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos); Borderlands 2 leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos).
Borderlands 2 leans clearly harder on execution.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Walking and lever-pulling demand essentially nothing physical
Borderlands 2
Aim matters but generous hit feel
Borderlands 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Manpigs are scripted set-dressing, rarely a true threat
Borderlands 2
Enemies are scripted loot fodder
Borderlands 2 leans clearly harder on variance.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
First-run unknowns are the whole experience; spoilers defuse it
Borderlands 2
Procedurally generated weapon drops vary
Borderlands 2 leans clearly harder on optimization.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Light puzzles and routes are trivially solvable on repeat
Borderlands 2
Skill trees and gear math heavily solved
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.