Building comparison
head to head
Amnesia: A Machine for PigsvsL.A. Noire
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Optimization · Systems & Chaos
A narrative-driven horror walk through a Victorian slaughterhouse engine, lighter on systems than its predecessor.
L.A. Noire
Optimization · Systems & Chaos
1940s detective procedural built around crime scenes and reading scripted interrogation tells.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos); L.A. Noire leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos).
Amnesia: A Machine for PigsL.A. Noire
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 2
L.A. Noire leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Walking and lever-pulling demand essentially nothing physical
L.A. Noire
Light shooting and driving, very forgiving
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Manpigs are scripted set-dressing, rarely a true threat
L.A. Noire
Suspects follow fixed scripts, never adapt
Variance4 vs 4
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
First-run unknowns are the whole experience; spoilers defuse it
L.A. Noire
Interrogation tells and clues hidden until discovered
Optimization5 vs 5
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Light puzzles and routes are trivially solvable on repeat
L.A. Noire
Evidence chains and question choices have fixed correct answers
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.