head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A dinosaur survival game about taming, building, and tribal warfare on a hostile island.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A campaign strategy game where army composition meets real-time micro.
ARK: Survival Evolved leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Total War: Warhammer III leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
ARK: Survival Evolved leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
ARK: Survival Evolved
Shooting and kiting matter in raids
Total War: Warhammer III
Real-time micro of units rewards quick hands.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
ARK: Survival Evolved
Tribe warfare involves human deception and politics
Total War: Warhammer III
Campaign AI scripted; multiplayer battles adapt.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
ARK: Survival Evolved
Taming rolls, spawns, and surprise raids
Total War: Warhammer III
Campaign events and battle terrain vary.
Total War: Warhammer III leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
ARK: Survival Evolved
Breeding lines, base design, and farming dominate
Total War: Warhammer III
Army comp, magic, and campaign economy are solvable.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.