Building comparison
head to head
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2vsStar Wars: Squadrons
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Execution · Competitive PvP
Blockbuster 2009 sequel famous for killstreak chains and frantic multiplayer.
Star Wars: Squadrons
Execution · Grand Arena
Team-based 5v5 Star Wars starfighter combat with cockpit power management.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Star Wars: Squadrons leans Execution (Grand Arena).
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2Star Wars: Squadrons
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 8
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Fast time-to-kill rewards raw aim and reflex
Star Wars: Squadrons
Drifting, aim, and throttle tricks decide dogfights
Reads6 vs 6
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Outguessing human rotations and flanks
Star Wars: Squadrons
Human pilots in 5v5 bait, juke, and counter-adapt
Variance3 vs 2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Spawn flips and killstreak randomness
Star Wars: Squadrons
Full information maps; little randomness
Optimization5 vs 6
Star Wars: Squadrons leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Killstreak economy, loadout and map knowledge
Star Wars: Squadrons
Power management and loadout meta are solvable layers
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.