head to head
Conqueror's Blade asks more than Red Dead Redemption 2, and the gap is reads.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Commanding counter-picked units against adapting human generals in large siege battles.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.
Conqueror's Blade leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Conqueror's Blade
Personal combat and unit micro matter in every siege
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
Conqueror's Blade leans clearly harder on reads.
Conqueror's Blade
Human commanders feint, flank and adapt across a siege
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Conqueror's Blade
Little randomness - outcomes follow positioning and composition
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
Conqueror's Blade leans clearly harder on optimization.
Conqueror's Blade
Unit counters, doctrines and economy reward deep system knowledge
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.