head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A tactical shooter where precise gunplay against human opposition is the deciding skill.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
High-speed aim and movement dominance against human opponents fighting for weapon and map control.
Counter-Strike: Condition Zero leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Unreal Tournament (1999) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Unreal Tournament (1999) leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Condition Zero
aim and spray control decide duels
Unreal Tournament (1999)
Shock combo and flak cannon timing demand peak motor precision
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Condition Zero
predicting human opponent positioning
Unreal Tournament (1999)
Human opponents continuously adapt routes and engagement choices
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Condition Zero
buy-round economy and drops vary slightly
Unreal Tournament (1999)
Map spawns are minor; most information is visible or predictable
Counter-Strike: Condition Zero leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Condition Zero
economy management and utility usage solvable
Unreal Tournament (1999)
Weapon prioritisation and map control are learnable but secondary
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.