head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
A kid-friendly mystery adventure testing light deduction over scripted cases.

Optimization · Light / Casual
A gorgeous first-person mystery about piecing together a boy's disappearance.
Detective Pikachu leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos); The Vanishing of Ethan Carter leans Optimization (Light / Casual).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Detective Pikachu
Tapping through investigation scenes asks nothing
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter
Walking and looking, nothing more
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Detective Pikachu
Witnesses are scripted, never adapting to you
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter
No opponent
Detective Pikachu leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Detective Pikachu
Case facts are hidden until testimony reveals them
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter
The mystery is hidden only until discovered
Detective Pikachu leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Detective Pikachu
Assembling clues into conclusions is gentle fixed logic
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter
Reconstructing event sequences is light deduction
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.