Building comparison
head to head
DOOM (2016)vsWorld Tour Soccer 2002
World Tour Soccer 2002 asks more than DOOM (2016), and the gap is reads.
DOOM (2016)
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Push-forward arena FPS where movement and aim are the whole game.
World Tour Soccer 2002
Execution · Pure Mechanics
An arcade-style soccer simulation with licensed national teams.
DOOM (2016) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); World Tour Soccer 2002 leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
DOOM (2016)World Tour Soccer 2002
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 7
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Aim, movement, glory-kill timing all peak.
World Tour Soccer 2002
player control, passing and shooting precision
Reads1 vs 3
World Tour Soccer 2002 leans clearly harder on reads.
DOOM (2016)
Demons scripted attack patterns.
World Tour Soccer 2002
opponent play in human matches adds reads
Variance1 vs 2
World Tour Soccer 2002 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Minimal encounter randomness.
World Tour Soccer 2002
minor bounce/ref randomness
Optimization5 vs 4
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Rune and weapon mod picks meaningful.
World Tour Soccer 2002
tactics and formation choices solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.