head to head
Neither is harder. They score identically on all four axes, so the difference between them is in kind, not degree.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
A roguelike tower-defense hybrid about escorting a crystal through a randomised dungeon.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
Seminal 1994 strategy game mixing global base management with brutal turn-based alien squad combat.
Dungeon of the Endless leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos); X-COM: UFO Defense leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dungeon of the Endless
Pause-friendly control, no twitch demands
X-COM: UFO Defense
Turn-based; only inventory clicking
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dungeon of the Endless
Monster waves spawn by fixed door-opening rules
X-COM: UFO Defense
Alien AI is scripted, never adaptive
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dungeon of the Endless
Unknown rooms and random hero or item finds
X-COM: UFO Defense
Hit rolls, random maps, and unseen aliens punish constantly
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dungeon of the Endless
Dust economy and turret placement are the real game
X-COM: UFO Defense
Base economy, research order, and tactical doctrine are masterable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.