head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
The sequel adding Horde mode to the campaign-plus-versus cover shooter formula.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
A heavyweight sci-fi FPS pitting ISA soldiers against the Helghast with famously weighty gunfeel.
Gears of War 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Killzone 2 leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Killzone 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Gears of War 2
Gnasher battles and movement tech set the ceiling
Killzone 2
Weighty gunplay punishes imprecise aim hard
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Gears of War 2
Human opponents in versus drive prediction play
Killzone 2
Multiplayer opponents adapt; campaign AI doesn't
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Gears of War 2
Horde spawns add mild randomness
Killzone 2
Modest spawn and objective rotation noise
Gears of War 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Gears of War 2
Power-weapon timing and positioning are solvable
Killzone 2
Class unlocks and map control are learnable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.