head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A sprawling open-world crime epic with RPG-style character stats across a whole state.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Working through scripted movie levels where route knowledge outweighs reflexes.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Flying school and drive-bys need decent hands
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Clunky saber combat and platforming ask modest precision
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Gang AI is scripted, never adaptive
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Enemies follow simple fixed scripts
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Territory wars and traffic add light randomness
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Level layouts are fixed and quickly learned
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Stats, gym, weapon skill, and routes reward systematic play
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Knowing dialogue paths and level routes carries the game
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas →
full breakdown
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace →