head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Working through scripted movie levels where route knowledge outweighs reflexes.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Clunky saber combat and platforming ask modest precision
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Enemies follow simple fixed scripts
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Level layouts are fixed and quickly learned
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Knowing dialogue paths and level routes carries the game
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.