head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Sandbox medieval sim spanning personal swordplay up to running a kingdom's economy.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A narrative-heavy MMORPG where class rotation optimisation matters in raids and PvP warzones.
Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Star Wars: The Old Republic leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord
Directional melee blocking and mounted combat
Star Wars: The Old Republic
Operation combat has moderate GCD management and positional demands
Star Wars: The Old Republic leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord
Multiplayer duels add some human prediction
Star Wars: The Old Republic
PvP warzones feature real adaptive opponents
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord
Procedural campaign politics and battles
Star Wars: The Old Republic
Gear drop RNG is present but secondary to ability knowledge
Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord
Economy, army composition, and kingdom management dominate
Star Wars: The Old Republic
Advanced class ability rotations and set bonus builds are solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.