Building comparison
head to head
Planescape: TormentvsPokémon Ruby Version
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
Planescape: Torment
Optimization · Pure Optimization
A narrative RPG that tests knowledge of its philosophical systems and dialogue trees more than any combat skill.
Pokémon Ruby Version
Optimization · Pure Optimization
Team-building optimisation against fixed trainers with mapped RNG.
Planescape: Torment leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Pokémon Ruby Version leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Planescape: TormentPokémon Ruby Version
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 0
Planescape: Torment leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Planescape: Torment
Combat is deemphasised; the game is built to be avoided or trivial
Pokémon Ruby Version
Turn selection requires no dexterity
Reads1 vs 1
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Planescape: Torment
NPCs are scripted personalities; no adaptive opponent exists
Pokémon Ruby Version
Scripted trainers never adapt to your strategy
Variance3 vs 3
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Planescape: Torment
Some dialogue outcomes and item discoveries are hidden until explored
Pokémon Ruby Version
Encounter, catch and crit rolls are quickly mapped
Optimization7 vs 8
Pokémon Ruby Version leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Planescape: Torment
Stat allocation, dialogue routing and companion management reward system mastery
Pokémon Ruby Version
Abilities and natures deepen an already solvable type system
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.