head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Acrobatic puzzle-platformer where rewinding time turns every fatal mistake into a do-over.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A quest-stuffed 2.5D platformer where a pink-haired wild boy bites evil pigs to undo their curses.
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
Acrobatic platforming chains need timing; rewind softens failure
Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
Grab-and-throw platforming with moderate timing.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
Sand creatures attack on fixed cues
Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
Scripted pigs, no adaptation.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
Rewind power removes most consequence of surprise
Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
Fixed events; quests are deterministic.
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
Route reading and dagger resource management solve each room
Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
Interlocking 130-plus event quests reward sequencing.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.