head to head
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II asks more than Red Dead Redemption 2, and the gap is reads.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Tolkien-licensed RTS with freeform base building and large-scale faction warfare.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II
Moderate APM demands, forgiving unit control
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II leans clearly harder on reads.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II
Human opponents in skirmish reward prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II
Mostly open information, light randomness
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II leans clearly harder on optimization.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II
Economy, base layout, and faction counters drive wins
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Red Dead Redemption 2 →
full breakdown
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II →