head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A cyberpunk tactics game where karma allocation and archetype synergies define run efficiency.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
Extending Banner Saga's attrition model with tighter supply constraints and harder tactical puzzles.
Shadowrun Returns leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); The Banner Saga 2 leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Shadowrun Returns
Turn-based tactical combat; cover positioning deliberate not reactive
The Banner Saga 2
Same turn-based input structure as the original
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Shadowrun Returns
Enemy IC and guards run scripted patrol and aggro routines
The Banner Saga 2
No PvP; scripted enemy priority unchanged
The Banner Saga 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Shadowrun Returns
Hidden enemy positioning and matrix node layouts provide first-run unknowns
The Banner Saga 2
Caravan supply scarcity and battle RNG compound into harder variance
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Shadowrun Returns
Karma allocation and archetype synergies have known dominant configurations
The Banner Saga 2
Renown spending and unit promotion timing deepen the optimization layer
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.