head to head

Supreme Commander 2 cover artvsThe Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II cover art

Supreme Commander 2vsThe Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II

Supreme Commander 2 leans Optimization (Grand Arena); The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).

EXECUTION6 /10READS6 /10VARIANCE2 /10OPTIMIZATION8 /10
Supreme Commander 2The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II

Axis by axis

Execution6 vs 5

Supreme Commander 2 leans harder on execution: Macro APM across huge armies separates skirmish winners

Reads6 vs 5

Supreme Commander 2 leans harder on reads: Multiplayer rewards scouting and predicting a human's tech switches

Variance2 vs 2

Even - both lean on variance about the same.

Optimization8 vs 7

Supreme Commander 2 leans harder on optimization: Economy ratios, build orders and research routing are deeply solvable

Two games can score the same on an axis and still test it in very different ways - read each rationale, not just the number.

full breakdown

Supreme Commander 2

full breakdown

The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II