Gamorium's take

A high-execution fighter where one-frame links and opponent modelling separate competitors.
the cheat-test profile
Each axis is rated on its own - how far one cheat would trivialize the game here. They don't trade off; low on all four means the game is an experience, not a contest.
cheat: Aimbot - perfect inputs
One-frame links and FADC combos demand extreme motor precision
cheat: Out-predict an adaptive opponent
Reading opponent habits, wake-up patterns, and adaptations is the meta
cheat: See what's hidden / map the RNG
Virtually no RNG; every outcome is skill-driven
cheat: A perfect solver / coach
Frame data, punish windows, and matchup charts are deeply studied
Each axis is named by the cheat that would break the game along it. Execution is the hands. Reads is out-thinking an adaptive opponent. Variance is hidden information & RNG. Optimization is the solvable systems layer. A game's region is the top one or two axes.
These four aren't one rating split four ways - they're independent 0-10 questions. A 9 on one axis takes nothing from the others, and a game low on all four isn't missing data: it's telling you there's no skill here to cheat.
The basis is how the majority actually plays this game - not a niche mode or a personal run. For a game with very different modes (a story campaign versus ranked multiplayer), that's the version most people mean.
Ranked by shared genre first, then by how closely the cheat-test profile matches - a cross-genre tag means a pick matched on skill profile alone.

Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes
Grand Arena · tag fighting game