Infinifactory

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Loop is deterministic once understood

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Resource patch placement adds minor map randomness.

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Mouse-driven building with no time pressure

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Deterministic world with no randomised elements

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Otherwise the profiles match closely.

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 3) - Portal placement requires some precision but timing is lenient.

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Carrying items and timing fan avoidance is trivial

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - SCUMM interface eliminates any timing or motor demand

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Navigation has no twitch demands

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: optimization (9 vs 8) - Clone-placement puzzles have fixed solvable solutions

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Placement clicks only; no dexterity ceiling

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Almost fully deterministic waves