Metal Gear Solid: Integral

Both lean on execution about the same (4 vs 4). Biggest difference: optimization (6 vs 7) - Linear-ish levels still reward planned routes

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (4 vs 5) - Time-stops-when-you-stop removes most twitch pressure

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (4 vs 5) - Solid gunplay but squad does much lifting

Both lean on execution about the same (4 vs 4). Biggest difference: optimization (6 vs 5) - Shadow routes and lure tactics are learnable

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (4 vs 5) - Climbing, driving and shootouts need moderate dexterity

Both lean on execution about the same (4 vs 4). Biggest difference: variance (2 vs 3) - cover-based hit chances are randomized

Both lean on variance about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (4 vs 5) - Aiming matters but suppression mechanics soften it

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (4 vs 6) - Gunplay plus gyrocopter and elephant chaos

Both lean on variance about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (4 vs 3) - Action-leaning combat, dodge timing matters

Both lean on variance about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (4 vs 6) - Mark-and-execute and fast takedowns raise the physical ceiling

Both lean on variance about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (4 vs 6) - Mark-and-execute flow rewards quick, accurate play

Both lean on optimization about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: execution (4 vs 5) - Headshots, drone marking, and sync shots reward steady aim