Building comparison
head to head
Harry Potter and the Goblet of FirevsLEGO Jurassic World
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Execution · Light / Casual
A casual licensed action game testing little beyond light co-op coordination.
LEGO Jurassic World
Execution · Light / Casual
A family-friendly action-adventure where light puzzle-solving and platforming carry the fun.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire leans Execution (Light / Casual); LEGO Jurassic World leans Execution (Light / Casual).
Harry Potter and the Goblet of FireLEGO Jurassic World
Axis by axis
Execution3 vs 3
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Simple co-op spell casting with generous timing
LEGO Jurassic World
light platforming and combat precision
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Enemies are fixed waves, no adaptation
LEGO Jurassic World
scripted enemies, no adaptation
Variance1 vs 1
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Collectible bean locations are fixed
LEGO Jurassic World
minimal randomness
Optimization3 vs 2
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Light card collection and spell upgrade choices
LEGO Jurassic World
collectible routes lightly solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.