head to head
Neither is simply harder - they are hard in different places. Hidden in Plain Sight demands more execution; Town of Salem demands more optimization.

Reads · Pure Mind Games
A couch party game where players imitate AI characters and try to spot which sprites are human.

Reads · Pure Mind Games
A text-based social deduction game that distils bluffing, counter-deduction, and role optimisation against human opponents.
Hidden in Plain Sight leans Reads (Pure Mind Games); Town of Salem leans Reads (Pure Mind Games).
Hidden in Plain Sight leans clearly harder on execution.
Hidden in Plain Sight
Simple inputs; a steady trigger finger helps slightly.
Town of Salem
Text voting and clicking have no physical demand
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Hidden in Plain Sight
Acting like an NPC against watching humans is the entire game.
Town of Salem
Modelling human bluffers who adapt to your deductions is the game
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Hidden in Plain Sight
NPC crowds and random objectives provide cover noise.
Town of Salem
Role assignments and night-action targets vary every game
Town of Salem leans clearly harder on optimization.
Hidden in Plain Sight
Minimal systems; little to optimize beyond NPC mimicry.
Town of Salem
Role knowledge and voting strategy are learnable optimal policies
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.