Rough Justice: '84

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Kiting combat is simple but timing matters marginally

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Rifle aim and wolf struggles need minimal twitch

Both lean on variance about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 0) - Card selection has no dexterity element

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: optimization (7 vs 8) - Base economy, research order, and tactical doctrine are masterable

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (6 vs 5) - Wobbly physics makes identical setups resolve differently

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: optimization (7 vs 8) - Learning room interactions and optimal routing to reach Room 46 despite variance

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Light real-time battle nudging and timing

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (6 vs 7) - Dice-roll combat and random maps dominate single runs

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (6 vs 7) - Hidden map, random events and unknown story branches dominate

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Real-time orders need only light micro.

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Click speed only matters for leaderboard times

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Physics-grab interactions need only basic mouse control