Superliminal

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Walking and clicking; zero reflex demand

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Touchscreen-friendly design demands zero physical precision

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: optimization (7 vs 8) - Clone-placement puzzles have fixed solvable solutions

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 3) - Biker brawl sequences require basic timing not found elsewhere

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - One bullet-dodge finale aside, no dexterity

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Linear story with fixed world states

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - No randomness.

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Levels fully visible and deterministic

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Light job variety

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: optimization (7 vs 8) - Deducing which photo angle reconstructs the geometry needed to progress

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Deterministic world with no randomised elements

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - No physical demands on the player