Building comparison
head to head
Amnesia: A Machine for PigsvsWe Went Back
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Optimization · Systems & Chaos
A narrative-driven horror walk through a Victorian slaughterhouse engine, lighter on systems than its predecessor.
We Went Back
Optimization · Systems & Chaos
A short time-loop horror testing observation and deduction across repeating corridors.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos); We Went Back leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos).
Amnesia: A Machine for PigsWe Went Back
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 1
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Walking and lever-pulling demand essentially nothing physical
We Went Back
Walking a looping station needs no dexterity
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Manpigs are scripted set-dressing, rarely a true threat
We Went Back
Scares trigger on script, never adapting
Variance4 vs 4
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
First-run unknowns are the whole experience; spoilers defuse it
We Went Back
Loop changes are unknown until observed once
Optimization5 vs 6
We Went Back leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs
Light puzzles and routes are trivially solvable on repeat
We Went Back
Noticing loop differences and deducing the exit is the game
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.