head to head
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter asks more than Fat Princess, and the gap is execution.

Optimization · Mind & Math
Team objective tug-of-war testing class economy and reading the other team's pushes.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Planning approaches with recon tools, then executing them under lethal fire.
Fat Princess leans Optimization (Mind & Math); Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter leans clearly harder on execution.
Fat Princess
Simple hack-and-slash actions per class
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Lethal firefights punish sloppy aim and exposure
Fat Princess leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Fat Princess
Predicting enemy team pushes and rescues is constant
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Multiplayer squads outflank and adapt to your habits
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Fat Princess
Minor spawn and map noise
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Enemy placements are scripted-but-unknown on first attempt
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Fat Princess
Class economy, cake feeding and upgrade timing win matches
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Drone recon, squad orders and approach planning decide missions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.