Gloomhaven cover art

games like

Gloomhaven

Gloomhaven leans Optimization (Pure Optimization). Below: catalogued games with the closest cheat-test profile, and exactly where each one differs.

Matched first against: Role-playing (RPG), Strategy, Turn-based strategy (TBS), Tactical - then ranked by cheat-test profile.

EXECUTION1 /10READS1 /10VARIANCE5 /10OPTIMIZATION9 /10

12 games like Gloomhaven

A cross-genre tag below means that pick didn't share a genre - it filled a slot on cheat-test profile alone.

Knights of the Old Republic cover art
Knights of the Old RepublicPure Optimization · story-driven RPG

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Pseudo-turn-based d20 combat removes all twitch; timing aids exist but minor

full comparison →
Civilization V cover art
Civilization VPure Optimization · turn-based 4X

Both lean on variance about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - UI actions need no precision; speed is not a factor

full comparison →
Fallout 2 cover art
Fallout 2Pure Optimization · isometric RPG

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Turn-based AP system makes twitch entirely irrelevant

full comparison →
Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn cover art
Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of AmnPure Optimization · isometric party RPG

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Pause-and-plan removes twitch entirely; micro-placement has marginal value

full comparison →
Inscryption cover art
InscryptionPure Optimization · narrative deckbuilder

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: reads (1 vs 2) - Scripted opponents with light bluff moments, not true adaptation.

full comparison →
Vampire Survivors cover art
Vampire SurvivorsPure Optimization · survivor-like autoshooter

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: reads (1 vs 0) - Enemies follow fixed spawn scripts; no adaptive opponent.

full comparison →
Pillars of Eternity cover art
Pillars of EternityPure Optimization · isometric party RPG

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Real-time-with-pause removes all twitch pressure from the player

full comparison →
Fire Emblem: Awakening cover art
Fire Emblem: AwakeningPure Optimization · tactical SRPG

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - No twitch elements; pair-up placement is the only spatial decision under time

full comparison →
Sid Meier's Civilization cover art
Sid Meier's CivilizationPure Optimization · 4X strategy

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 0) - Turn-based clicking, zero physical demand

full comparison →
Divinity: Original Sin cover art
Divinity: Original SinPure Optimization · tactical party RPG

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Turn-based combat requires zero twitch; positioning is deliberate

full comparison →
Honkai: Star Rail cover art
Honkai: Star RailPure Optimization · turn-based RPG

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (1 vs 2) - Turn-based; physical input precision is essentially irrelevant

full comparison →
Plague Inc: Evolved cover art
Plague Inc: EvolvedPure Optimization · pandemic strategy

Both lean on execution about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: variance (5 vs 4) - country event timing

full comparison →

Game details

Released
2019
Developer
Flaming Fowl Studios
Franchise
Gloomhaven
Platforms
Series X|S, PS4, PC, PS5, Mac, XONE, Switch
Modes
Single player, Multiplayer, Co-operative
IGDB critics
74/100
IGDB users
41/100
Role-playing (RPG)StrategyTurn-based strategy (TBS)TacticalAdventureFantasyHistorical