CounterSpy

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (5 vs 6) - Sustained gunfights and stealth execution under pressure

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (0 vs 1) - Enemy AI is scripted patrol logic, not adaptive

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (0 vs 1) - suspects react but don't truly adapt

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (0 vs 1) - Drones and soldiers run fixed behaviors, never model you

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (0 vs 2) - Guards adapt loadouts across missions, light modeling.

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: variance (4 vs 2) - Wildlife and patrol variation

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: variance (4 vs 2) - Disguise suspicion feels fuzzy until learned

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: variance (4 vs 2) - Spawn order is unknown on a first attempt only

Both lean on optimization about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: variance (4 vs 2) - Mild uncertainty in enemy search behavior

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: variance (4 vs 2) - Encounters are scripted and repeatable

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: variance (4 vs 2) - Patrol noise reactions add small unpredictability

Both lean on optimization about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: execution (5 vs 7) - Long-range ballistics, bullet drop, and wind compensation are the core demand